Hi Paul,

On 21 Jan 00, at 10:33, Paul D. Robertson wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Frank Heinzius wrote:
> 
> > We prefer dedicated appliances in contrary to firewalls based on general 
> > purpose OS for the following reasons:
> > 
> > - more stability
> 
> I've had general purpose OS-based firewalls with 7-800 days of uptime
> before dropping them to put in a new NIC which was followed by another
> couple years of uptime- I've also heard horror stories of early appliance 
> implementations dropping every few weeks, care to quantify "more
> stabiltiy?"

Yes you�re right concerning the deployment of this unit. But what if you 
have customers like "Oh-I-got-this-nice-Solaris-machine-why-not-install-a-
Webserver-Ecommerce-insert-your-favorite-compromising-software-here". 
They exist :-(

> 
> > - more security 
> 
> I've yet to see a packet filter that allows blocking of, for instance
> hostile ActiveX controls, could you also please quantify "more security?"
> 

If you have a kind of interface to external proxy agents, this can be 
done with 3rd-party stuff.

> >- higher performance
> 
> In my experience, you get performance, or security - not both.
>  

It should be balanced...

> >- ease of use
> 
> The trend toward "easy" firewalls without the appropriate policies 
> is what makes most firewalls useful only against simple attacks.  The
> problem with "even an idiot could install it" is that the uninformed
> *will* install them.  Then they'll put Web servers on the internal
> network, open half a gazillion ports for streaming 
> media/Netmeeting/whatever comes next and *think* they're "protected by the
> firewall."

This is a general statement. If you are a firewall expert, you sell 
training as well. If you have resellers, you train them. No firewall 
protects from misuse of the admin...

> geologically unstable areas. Flash is still very expensive compared to
> disk, and I haven't seen any of the appliance manufactures address local
> logging without using a hard drive.

Logging shouldn�t be done on the appliance...loginfos should be sent to 
the management server.

> 
> It's also worth noting that as routers and switches gain more security
> features, and protocols become easier to tunnel over and increasingly
> necessary, "hardware" and "appliance" firewalls have no utility after
> they're obsolete.  You can always redeploy a Sparc to become a Web
> server, file server or Quake server.

...or install it on the firewall itself...it has been done :-(

Have a nice Weekend!



Kind Regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,

--
Frank M. Heinzius          MMS Communication AG         .~.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]        Eiffestrasse 598             /V\
http://www.mms.de          20537 Hamburg, Germany      // \\
Phone: +49 40 211105-40    Fax: +49 40 210 32 210     /(   )\
-- spam forbidden --       -- PGP key available --     ^^-^^
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to