On Mon, 22 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would assume it means, "DO NOT contact the suspected perpetrator,"
> because in criminal
> type cases, the suspect can start deleting files and/or destroying
> equipment when they
> find out someone is on to them.
Ah, but that's part of the point. If it's a remote attack, how do you
know who the suspected perp. is? Do we *really* need to make everything
into a criminal case? If not, then shouldn't there be some bounding of
what a government agency puts out? If the party line is to never notify
anyone other than law enforcement, then *I* think the community as a whole
loses something. Your Paranoia May Vary.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
