This was recently outlined in the firewalls wizards list. Is a very
interesting concept, in that the first hops afte3r the first public
address become transparent. The layout of the virtual network was a tad
different, but similiar to what you are asking here. Sorry, don't have
access here at this moment so, I can't paste it back here now, I'll do so
for you this evening.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Pitcock Family wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I was wondering if a dual NAT infrastructure would work or buy you any extra
> security.
>
> For Example:
>
> Valid Internet addresses
> |
> |
> Router with NAT
> 172.16.x.x internal
> |
> |
> FW-1 with DMZ 172.17.x.x
> 192.16.x.x internal networks NAT
>
> Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Rich
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
