Ahem..

Forgive me for breaking into the topic here and possibly arriving from
left field, but:

Table 4.1 of "Internet Firewalls and Network Security" (Sijan/Hare, 1995)
shows this:
Port Number             Description
23                      Telnet
25                      SMTP(mail)

So, why would you not simply use the sepaerate port numbers for the
seperate applications; and why would a firewall not know the difference
between these ports?
(Please forgive this newbie, O Great Firewall Wizards)

Am I missing a huge foundation of knowledge here?

On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:47:01 +0200 mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is nothing that a firewall can use to distinguish a 
> "normal"client 
> from a guy who telnet to the
> port, for the simple reason that both are exactly the same thing.
> 
> an smtp connection consists of a client connectiing to port 25 of a 
> host 
> sending commands and
> reading responses. This client may be anything that is capable of 
> handling 
> a TCP connection.
> The telnet program may be used for this.
> 
> so a firewall that rejects an SMTP connection just because it thinks 
> it is 
> coming from a "user doing
> telnet" is not only stupid, but it is not serving SMTP. relying on 
> headers 
> is not only useless, it is a
> loss of developpers energy, of the host CPU and yet another source 
> of bugs.
> 
> The problem of forged SMTP connections is the same as that of forged 
> 
> letters. the only way to guard against
> is to add a verification process which makes it harder to 
> communicate by 
> email. you can use encryption to make
> sure who sent what, but only if you know who can send you mail. if 
> you 
> accept to receive email from anybody,
> then that's it, you choosed to get served, accept the risks....
> 
> 
> mouss
> 
> 
> At 10:43 23/08/00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >The characteristics of a Telnet connection are significantly 
> different 
> >from a standard SMTP connection and some firewall proxies can 
> recognize 
> >and drop Telnet connections but what's the point?   It's trivial to 
> create 
> >an interactive SMTP emulation that would bypass this check.  The 
> port is 
> >designed to for TCP connections that passes ASCII text characters.  
> What 
> >would you be accomplishing by preventing/dropping Telnet 
> connections?
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to