It's always and will be a discussion about MS vs. Linux..
MS and linux isn't by definition secure. You still have to do
some serious editing and tweaking to make it secure.
Every OS has it's pro's and cons...
That's something you will keep.
Brenno
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Steele [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: dinsdag 30 januari 2001 14:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MS vs Linux
>
> Hey, I use Microsoft Proxy Server. But I think it might be a chalk and
> cheese comparison that you're making there. And I KNOW quite a few people
> might not agree with your reasons for thinking a Linux-based solution is
> not
> secure :-).
>
>
> Brian Steele
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "SERCONI, Miguel Hernández" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:29 AM
> Subject: MS vs Linux
>
>
> > Hello everyone. I´m more or less new in firewalls. Can anyone tell me
> why
> > nobody in this list use Microsoft Proxy Server.
> > Where are the differences. Is there any good paper with a comparison of
> > them?. From a point of view of someone that don´t know anything about
> linux
> > it seems to me as not secure because everyone knows the code and can
> change
> > it.
> >
> > waiting for your advise
> >
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
