You have just opened a can of worms - they are both good - each has a
different way of doing things though. My experiance is that the FW-1/Nokia
works great for Internet traffic but boggs down when you are firewalling
between LANS or any high bandwidth connections. FW-1 is certainly easier
to manage and track logs with then a PIX.
JMHO - sjk
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Timothy K. Cornelius wrote:
>
>
> We are currently running CheckPoint FW-1 on a Nokia 440. My boss wants to
> replace it with a Cisco Pix firewall.
> My question is which is the better firewall and why. I need a reason to keep
> the current firewall. I personally like the FW-1, but I am also certified in
> it too.
>
> any help is greatly appreciated
>
> Timothy K Cornelius
> Systems/Network Administrator
> LIFE Outreach International
> 817-267-4211 ext. 463
>
> when you call the office number
> it will roll over to my cell
> phone after a few rings
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
_____________________________________
Steven Kent
Senior Consultant
onShore, Inc. -- Network Engineering Group
312.850.5200
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
