On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David Ishmael managed to produce:
| Not sure why but I can't replicate either using the DWORD in a browser or
| trying a ping:
|
| Here's the output:
|
| C:\>ping -n 3510483697
| IP address must be specified.
It's a MS flaw - just tried it under Linux - works - tried it under
W2k - fails.
J.
I don't walk.. I advance.
10:39pm up 71 day(s), 4:25, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.06
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Network Operations
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? mouss
- Re: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Nick Simicich
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? David Ishmael
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Alan Olsen
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Michael Nelson
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? mouss
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Frost, Ron
- Re: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Devin L. Ganger
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Jasper Jans
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Carl E. Mankinen
- Re: [Awfully OT] Who can explain this address sch... Mike Fetherston
- Re: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? mouss
- Re: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Devin L. Ganger
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? John_G_Taylor
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? Bergerud
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? William . Stackpole
- RE: [OT] Who can explain this address scheme? mouss
