At 12:19 26/04/01 -0400, Dan Riley wrote: >mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > not just that. NetBSD stresses on design, and as a result has a better > > architecture. > > you'll hardly see things added to NetBSD just because someone find it hard > > to sleep at night:) > >Right--with NetBSD, things get left out because someone found it hard to >sleep at night :-) I'm sure our girlfriends and wives (respectively boyfriends and husbands) will agree that there are better things to do then:-} Hopefully, some are free and can code... cheers, mouss - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) David Lang
- Re: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Ben Nagy
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) John Jasen
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) mouss
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Randal, Phil
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Jose Nazario
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Randal, Phil
- Re: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Dan Riley
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Ron DuFresne
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Klaus Schulze
- RE: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...) Ron DuFresne
