FYI
http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/24050.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus J. Ranum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gauntlet
> 
> 
> Michael Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >How many people are still using Gauntlet?  We have since 
> v2.1 when TIS was
> >still in charge.
> 
> I still have one. It's a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and a pair of 10mbit
> network interfaces. :) I think it was unit #14 or #15 but 
> they were never
> serialized so I can't tell for sure. It still works fine but 
> I admit it's not
> acting as an operational firewall anymore.
> 
> By the way, the early Gauntlets Did The Right Thing with SNMP: they
> didn't recognize it because it's an evil bodged-up p.o.s. of 
> a protocol. They
> didn't proxy it, and they didn't let it through. I guess this would be
> where I get to say "I told y'all so..." but that's shooting fish in a 
> barrel.. ;)
> 
> mjr.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Firewalls mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
> 
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to