Re: Proxy vs stateful... oh no, not again :) (Was: Re: MigrationfromGauntlet 5 to Firewall-1)

[Mikael Olsson]

"Paul D. Robertson" wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mikael Olsson wrote:
> 
> > Okay then damnit :)
> > <marketroid warning>
> > Ubj qbrf shyy-qhcyrk tvtnovg guebhtuchg teno ln?
> > </marketroid warning>
> 
> I can't easily imagine an architecture where placing a single point of
> failure/filtering upon such a pipe would be my first choice :-P  

So don't get something that can't be HAified? :)

> Is that WITH ISN rewriting at full saturation 

Definately.

> with http 1.0?

Ouch man. You'll need to let me go check how fat Intel are 
making their CPUs these days first :P


-- 
Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB
Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden
Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00   Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05
Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50       WWW: http://www.clavister.com

Ynlre 8 frphevgl fbyhgvbaf: uggc://yneg.onqs00q.bet
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls