On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Laura A. Robinson wrote: > inherently imply that he said something to which they're a counterattack. My > POINT is, MS didn't call it a firewall, didn't market it as a firewall, > didn't submit it to any body for certification as a firewall and didn't > design it as a firewall.
Regarding Proxy 2.0: http://www.microsoft.com/catalog/display.asp?subid=22&site=590 Under Overview- "Microsoft proxy Server 2.0 is an extensible firewall and content cache server,..." Under Benefits- "Firewall Security: Protects internal network while allowing connection to the Internet with real-time alerting and logging." Your point would be wrong. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions [EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
