> > This is incorrect. ISA is *not* MS Proxy > > [...] comparing a proxy to a hybrid firewall > > and calling them the same thing > > Hrm. If my memory serves me, MS Proxy did packet filtering > and proxying. That also classifies as a hybrid.
How familiar are you with MS Proxy? It wasn't a firewall and wasn't marketed as a firewall. It offered some features in common with firewall products, but it was a *proxy*. > > And, whether you like it or not, ISA server _DID_ evolve from > MS proxy. Now, what that means in terms of code re-use and > design choices, I simply do not know. Your guess is as good > as mine. ISA is not MS Proxy. How much clearer do I have to be? I don't recall saying anything beyond what you quoted above. When did Microsoft submit MS Proxy for ICSA certification? When did Microsoft market MS Proxy as a *firewall*? Do you people ever actually have constructive discussions, or is there some point in playing pedantic semantics all day? Laura _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
