FIS, Loet, Joe:

This message is a response to Loet's notion that morphogenesis is a red-herring.

Before my specific comments, I would like to acknowledge Michel for his 
excellent introduction to the conceptualization of chemo-informatics as a 
branch of information theory and engineering of chemical systems. The 
motivation for the work of developing chemo-informatics come from various 
sources, but, generally speaking, they are tied to the concept of DESIGN - 
another term for morphogenesis.  

Practical chemistry searches for ways to get a job done by finding ways to use 
chemical knowledge to solve a problem.  Often, this means testing a range of 
different chemicals to see if the desired effects are obtained. In the early 
history of chemistry, various natural sources of different sorts of matter were 
empirically tested. Following the theoretical developments in the late 18th and 
early 19th century, mathematical chemistry slowly developed from the concepts 
introduced by John Dalton that all chemical structures were ratios of small 
whole numbers composed from different chemical elements.  Given the large 
number of different sorts of chemical elements and the unbounded number of 
combinatorial possibilities, the chemical community gradually developed a 
system of mathematics which captured the essential features of the information 
content of chemical structures.  The mathematical system is simple enough to be 
taught in high school but the combinatorial 'explosion' of structures and 
properties is so vast that a sub-discipline of 'chemo-informatics' was 
developed just to study the interrelations between subsets of chemical 
structures and subsets of chemical properties.

 Chemo-informatics developed a separate form of information as Michel has 
summarized. The form (ie, the morphology) of chemical information is iconic. 
The atomic numbers, as icons, are combined to form chemical structures, the 
basic mathematical objects of chemo-informatics. Chemo-informatics developed a 
separate form of logic. The logic of chemo-informatics has both regular 
components, such as those associated with mass (strictly additive) and 
irregular components, such as those associated with electrical parity of iconic 
representations of atomic numbers. For the electrical associations, a separate 
method of relational addition was developed as a theory of valence (from 
empirical observations). The later theory is closely akin to and the precursor 
of mathematical category theory. The iconic representation of atomic numbers is 
calculated in terms of graphs. Chemo-informatics can be thought of as the 
logical precursor of both category theory and graph theory. Charles S. Peirce, 
1839-1914, laid the foundations for modern logic, based on both chemistry (his 
term - existential graphs as forms of logic) and Scholastic logic. 

Today, the practice of chemistry is a practice of mathematics, a practice of 
relational calculations on numbers.  Organic chemical analysis and chemical 
synthesis, including all molecular biological structures, are based on proof 
theory. The notion of "proof of structure" in an exact notion that establishes 
an exact graphical relationship between Dalton's 'ratio of small whole numbers' 
and the iconic forms of chemical structures. Chemo-informatics is closely 
associated with bio-informatics. A substantial portion of bioinformatics 
consists of counting possible chemical forms or closely related forms that 
differ in sequences. Bio-informatics can be thought of as "engineering" 
extension of the potential for simple combinatorics (graphs) of atomic numbers 
to generate sequences of subgraphs. Again, the "combinatorial explosion" rears 
it head. Each potential sequence has its own unique form.  The morphogenesis of 
spatial forms of matter is studied by the several methodologies, such as x-ray 
diffraction patterns.  

One example with which I have had several years of experience with is the 
development of a drug for epilepsy.  On average, between 1,000 and 10,000 
different unique structures were examined for each drug that eventually made it 
to market.  Chemo-informatics and biological assays and clinical trials were 
all critical components of the process. All three sorts of empirical studies 
were necessary to identify a useful medicine. The morphological form of the 
isomers are critical components of matching of 'drug' to  a 'receptor'. 

I bring this example to the discussion to illustrate the application of 
chemo-informatics as a practical way of sending messages to the human body. 
Such messages, contained within a mathematically-defined iconic form, are 
intimately interrelated to bio-informatics, the expression of forms of genetic 
information. 

Thus, Loet, I can not concur with your following assertions.
> 
> It seems to me that the issue of "morphology" and its evolution is a red 
> herring in a discussion about information theory. A shape (e.g., a network) 
> can be described as a graph or also numerically.

1. Please provide a reference for the assertion that the conformation of 
protein structures can be calculated from the chemical graph of the protein.  
2. Are you mixing continuous and discrete concepts?

> This numerical description can easily be evaluated in terms of information 
> theory. Information theory, also offers options to develop measures for the 
> evolution over time (such as, Kullback-Leibler divergence, cf. Theil (1972).)
> 
> As formalisms from information theory can be applied to any system of 
> substantive communication, they can also be applied on system of formal 
> communication, such as sets of coordinates. 

3. Metabolic networks are chemo-informatic message networks, generated from 
biochemical - genetic information. Are you excluding metabolic networks as 
systems of substantive communication?

4. ditto for mental networks?
> 
> Best wishes,
> Loet

Loet, your point of view, from my perspective, is based on a generalized 
inductive argument on formalisms.  If a generalized inductive argument for 
chemo-informatics existed, there would be no need for the particular inductive 
logic used to construct chemical forms - for the morphogenesis of chemical 
conformations from atomic numbers. 

At the abstract logical root, the difference between chemo-informatics and 
Shannon informatics lies in the empirical basis of induction. The generalized 
inductive argument of Shannon encodes all messages as numbers and then encodes 
the numbers into electrical signals.  Message transmission in Shannon theory 
relies on several generalized inductions related to electrical properties of 
matter. The decoding of such messages inverts the order of the encoding, 
regenerating the original message.

Chemo-informatics lacks any generalized encoding.  (Dalton's law would not be 
an essential part of chemo-informatics if such a generalized encoding existed.) 
  Chemo-informatics is based on the logic of the identity of matter.  This 
concept of identity of a labeled bipartite graph, the basic object of  
chemo-informatics is not the concept of identity as used in Shannon 
information. 

A simple example of the mathematical distinction between chemo-informatics and 
Shannon informatics is crystal clear.
The arithmetic operation of multiplication is integral to Shannon informatics.
The arithmetic operation of multiplication on the atomic numbers generates 
nonsense - if one multiples 2 (helium) by 3 (lithium), one does not get 6 
(carbon).

The fundamental logical distinction that Dalton introduced over one hundred 
years ago was a new form of inductive mathematics. The development of the 
chemical sciences and molecular biology and personalized medicine follows from 
this form of inductive logic. C. S. Peirce developed a framework for relational 
logic from the recognition that a thing can be a source of representation and 
that the method of representation is the source of the form, the source of the 
message. Chemo-informatics follows Peirce in the sense that it is necessary to 
distinguish among the symbol for networks of atomic numbers, the indexes for 
molecules and the iconic representations of the forms of molecules.  

The physical basis of chemical logic is now well understood in terms of the 
international system of units. Each atomic number is a different electrical 
electrical category. Conjoining two different electrical objects creates a new 
electrical object, a new category.  Conjoining N different atomic numbers (a 
molecular formula) creates the combinatorial explosions, often loosely referred 
to as the isomer problems.  The same N atomic numbers can be combined into N' 
(N' >>> N) iconic forms. Each of the N' iconic forms has the same mass and the 
same electrical particles, but each has different identity as a consequence of 
the arrangements of the parts of the whole. The alternative ways of connecting 
numbers into graphs lies at the heart of the chemo-informatics challenge.

Robert Rosen recognized that a profound difference existed between "natural 
systems" and formal systems.  He postulated that different forms of 
representation were needed. Rosen's theory, unfortunately, completely excluded 
chemo-informatics from consideration, he chose to place his logical analysis of 
biology on thermodynamic considerations. As a consequence, no path from Rosen's 
system of thought to chemo-informatics has been, to the best of my knowledge, 
found. The differences in the notion of artificial addition and natural 
addition of numbers make such a path from Rosen's conjectures to 
chemo-informatics appear impossible.

In summary: Chemo-informatics differs from Shannon informatics as the natural 
atomic numbers differ from artificial numbers abstracted from the properties of 
the integers.  (By artificial numbers I am referring to the generalized 
inductive abstractions of irrational, imaginary, and transcendental objects 
associated with the continuum of the real number line.) 


Cheers

Jerry

(Footnote: Greetings to all my friends on the list.  I have moved to Minnesota 
and been in reclusion for several months, completing the logic of the perplex 
number system.  From my reclusion, I am optimistic about a springtime eclosion. 
  :-)  :-)  :-)  )









_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to