Dear Francesco,
 
That is all his private, there can't be many people who agree with that
saying, please just skip it! 
 
Xueshan
 
  _____  

From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Francesco Rizzo
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 10:38 PM
To: Pedro C. Marijuan
Cc: fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] [Fwd: RE: It from Bit redux . . . MODERATION] From
Xueshan


Cari Tutti, 
la neg-entropia (energia libera o INFORMAZIONE in condizione di
dis-equilibrio improbabile) di "Che cos'è la vita? La cellula vivente dal
punto di vista fisico" di Erving Schrodinger e la "evaporazione" di
INFORMAZIONE di Stephan  Hawking che compensa l'asimmetria tra entropia
interna (minore) e l'entropia esterna (maggiore) dei buchi neri dove le
mettiamo?
Scusate la  domanda.
Francesco Rizzo



======================================

Dear Pedro, Joseph, John, Krassimir, Rafael, and All,

Here I tell you some interesting stories about “It from Bit” in China.

Around the year of 2000, The Seminar of Interdisciplinary Information
Science of Peking University came into contact for the first time with
Wheeler’s “It from Bit”, in fact, earlier this theory, we had just
discussed Stonier’s “Information Physics” and had consulted with the Dean
of Physics School, his opinion was: The concept ENTROPY is enough to
physics, it is unnecessary to blunder in the fashion of information for
physicists. Of course, that was over fifteen years ago.

We afterwards had been tracking this information problem in Science of China
History; So far, we found there are at least four doctrines related to “It
from Bit”.

1. It from Taiji. Zhou Wenwang (Ji Chang), see his book: “The Book of
Changes” (Yijing or Zhouyi), B.C. 1050;
2. It from Dao. Laozi. see his book: “Tao Te Ching” (Daodejing), B.C. 500;
3. The world is composed of information. Xinxi Shen, see his book:
“Informatilism”, 2005;
4. The world is informational. Jianghuo Wang, see his book: “Unified
Information Theory”, 2012.

To my knowledge, the last two authors had not contacted Wheeler’s “It from
Bit”, that Ji Chang and Laozi had no contacted with it is very obvious.

In all his lifetime, Wheeler once visited China only one time in 1981, when
he stayed in China, he watched a Beijing Opera named “Feng Ming Qi Shan”.
When a general hold a flag on which a large Chinese word appeared, he asked
the accompany that what is the meaning of that word, they told him its
meaning is NOTHING, he said excitedly: The answer what I am looking for
desperately all my life about the physical reality, your ancestors had
originally given thousands years ago. (see his book: “Wheeler’s Lectures
on Physics and Austerity”, 1982).

So far, on the argument of “It from Bit”, we can not prove it is correct,
but can not prove it is wrong too.

Best wishes,

Xueshan
16:18, June 16, 2015
Peking University

-------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis




_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to