Dear Michel, Ok. Steve Keen has been close to Tony Lawson's work (he presented Minsky at Lawson's conference last year) - he's a supporter of his broad thesis, although obviously he's done more mathematical modelling which Lawson has some possibly valid objections to. They've had some fascinating critical exchanges.
This blog by Steve is interesting - http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/13775327-the-need-for-pluralism-in-economics Hayek is in the mix, as is perhaps a shared disdain for Stiglitz and co. I like Steve's work, and his prediction of the crisis is good, and (relevant to this discussion) I like the fact that his simulation tool Minsky is freely available for download here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/minsky/ So, to come back to my original comment... It's possible to explain this stuff with video, isn't it?... Best wishes, Mark -----Original Message----- From: "Michel Godron" <migod...@wanadoo.fr> Sent: 29/10/2016 14:06 To: "Mark Johnson" <johnsonm...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Fis] Scientific communication Dear Mark, You write : "I'm guessing you are thinking of the line of thought from Hayek to Stiglitz?" It is not at all my way. Among the economists I shoud be rather in agreement with Keen and Minsky (I could send some pages explaining (in french) why. Cordialement. M. Godron Le 29/10/2016 à 14:22, Mark Johnson a écrit : > I'm guessing you are thinking of the line of thought from Hayek to > Stiglitz?
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
