> I've personally found darcs to be much simpler to use than other > verion control systems. It is possible it just fits with my way of > thinking, but I usually find that dose what I want it to to a much > higher degree than other versioning systems. On the minus-side, it > seems possible to make darcs break repos, and it is slower than many > other systems. YMMV.
I found darcs to be an excellent tool. I have sent to this mailing list (or was I supposed to mail them directly to you?) two patches with 'darcs send'. They are two only because I have forgotten two files in the first patch. There are some differences from the preliminary versions: I renamed the functions in a more consistent way, switched some options from -s to -o (since they do not allow to be chained) and beautified some descriptions. Let me know of any further issue. Giorgio Lando ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
