On 8/4/07, Giorgio Lando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've personally found darcs to be much simpler to use than other > > verion control systems. It is possible it just fits with my way of > > thinking, but I usually find that dose what I want it to to a much > > higher degree than other versioning systems. On the minus-side, it > > seems possible to make darcs break repos, and it is slower than many > > other systems. YMMV. > > I found darcs to be an excellent tool. I have sent to this mailing list > (or was I supposed to mail them directly to you?) two patches with 'darcs > send'. > They are two only because I have forgotten two files in the first patch. > > There are some differences from the preliminary versions: I renamed the > functions in a more consistent way, switched some options from -s to -o > (since they do not allow to be chained) and beautified some > descriptions. > Let me know of any further issue. > Giorgio Lando
Hi, I've applied the patches. Thank you for the contribution, feel free to submit more patches! Axel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Fish-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
