As far as I'm aware the original owner of fish (Axel Liljencrantz) kind of
vanished and nobody reading this list has write access to the darcs repo.
Just to check: Is there anyone reading this who has access to either the
darcs repository, the wiki on fishshell.org, or the fish shell
sourceforge.org project???
Barring that, the gitorious repo has basically become 'upstream', I guess.
As far as I'm concerned, I'd say anyone who has useful patches should be
allowed to put them in, and stable stuff should go into master.
The only problem I see is that designing language like things such as the
shell language generally doesn't work very well if it's done by multiple
people, and there is not one lead BDFL. On the other hand, I don't think
there's a lot that still needs to be added to the language. But if we do, we
should think twice about any change.
Jan
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 07:34, Suraj Kurapati <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Christopher Nilsson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It looks like there's a few patches coming through over in the gitorious
> > repository (Grissiom is powering along, alongside some older branches
> with
> > unmerged patches...).
>
> Indeed, it's heartening to see active development by the Fish community. :)
>
> > What happens when folks are happy with the changes?
>
> I say we should merge them into the gitorious master branch.
>
> > Is the master branch is intended to be a pristine mirror of the official
> > darcs repo, with changes hanging on the side in dev branches?
> > Once happy with the dev branch, should we push upstream to darcs?
>
> I would like to say that the Darcs repository is not "upstream"
> anymore; the gitorious repository has taken its place instead.
>
> > Or is the gitorious repo meant to become the official spot, and it's just
> > that no-one has yet dared to merge? :)
>
> Yes, I believe this is correct.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> _______________________________________________
> Fish-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
