On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Grissiom <chaos.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think -without-xsel is good for distros. Because the pkg manager of
> that distro can "suggest" to install xsel together with fish, which is
> more cleaner way IMHO.
>
There is such thing as 'optional dependencies' in archlinux. My question is,
if I compile fish with xsel enabled, will xsel be mandatory for fish then?
Or can fish run just fine without xsel installed?
BTW, is it ready for a new release? I'm not competent to fire the
> release but I'm just curious about it. I think a new release could
> attract more eyes and thus bring more users/devs.
>
I agree with that. A press statement would be good as well, where all the
news are clearly stated.
Many in the archlinux community have concerns about the future of fish.
But we love fish!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
