Hi Gustaf, Hello list. Thanks very much for the vim syntax file. I spent two hours last night trying to make one, it's quite complicated, at least for me.
Thanks for the fishystuff link too. I am all set, I am going to start writing my fish scripts now, I hope later when the wiki is up I will have something to contribute, right now I can't think of anything useful I can do in terms of code. The founders email is/was a...@liljencrantz.se. This domain is his families website, they keep photos there and such(sensibly protected with login). There is a contact there, e...@liljencrantz.se, do you think I should ask him what has happened to Axel? It would be nice to bring this mystery to a close, I personally fear something bad may have happened to him. His code is wonderful and was so much work. If I was going to abandon a project I would say goodbye and pass it on to someone else and if I was angry with the community and burning out, I'd tell everybody to go to hell before leaving :) How can someone just walk away from >25K lines of terrific code? Talk soon guys-Patrick On 11-07-06 04:31 PM, Gustaf Johansson wrote: > Hi Patrick and list! > > There is already a vim syntax highlighting script present see > https://github.com/vim-scripts/fish.vim i have not used it myself but > looking at it it seems to be correct although somewhat old > (2005/11/08). > > I also find the information for new users somewhat lacking and > problematic in a few areas, i have been on the hunt for a new and > better shell for a few months now and just passed by fish without even > testing it based on info which has proven to be incorrect. > The statements around the web that the project is abandoned when its > not, that it using a bad syntax when in fact its using a nicely > written and very well designed one was some of the reasons i didn't > even try the shell until i got irritated at the complete syntax in > zsh. > > I hope that the "new" site will rectify some of these problems and it > would also be good if the old one could be brought down. > > Has anyone tried to contact Mr Axel? > Or does anyone know why he has abandoned the project? > > One other thing i have been wondering is why the fish completions > posted at the Arch wiki isnt in the main repo? > Those along with the ones present in "private" git repos would just > add to the value of the shell (ex > https://github.com/esodax/fishystuff/ functions and completions). > > Regards Gustaf > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > Fish-users mailing list > Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
