[This message was posted by Wayne Harrison of System Engineering Limited 
<[email protected]> to the "4.0 Session" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/12. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b826b93c - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

> Wayne, there is no prohibition in the FIX spec that prevents the
> initiator from sending messages as soon as a Logon message has been
> sent. But it'll likely make state handling and encryption a good deal
> more difficult.
> 
> From the acceptor side, there's no reason why it couldn't queue up the
> messages -- that's really just a transport issue.
> 
> Before discussing how someone might do this, I'd ask for the use-case.
> Is there really a reason that an initiator would want to send a series
> of messages before the connection has been established? I'm not closed
> to the idea, just interested what reasons there might be. The one reason
> I could think off-hand is that an initiator is occasionally bringing up
> a FIX message to blast some messages really quickly before shutting down
> the session. But that'd probably trying to fix a transport/bandwidth
> issue and would be better solved via FIX 5.0 with a change of transport
> semantics.

Sean,

Thanks for your reply. What you say makes perfect sense and fits in with my 
reading of the FIX.4.0. I don't have a specific use-case, I'm just trying to 
get a handle on the FIX protocol. I have experience with other protocols and it 
seemed a little unusual, so I wanted to ensure that I hadn't misunderstood the 
spec.

Wayne.

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to