[This message was posted by Scott Atwell of American Century Investments
<[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/d52f5868 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Discrepancy: Control/@initFixTag needs fix tag number vs. Edit/@field expecting
"FIX_" + FIXFieldName
FIXatdl 1.1 spec defines Edit/@field:
When referring to a standard FIX tag then the name must be pre-pended
with the string “FIX_”, e.g. "FIX_OrderQty".
but defines Control/@initFixTag (pos int):
Indicates the initialization value is to be taken from this standard
FIX tag.
I think Control/@inifFixTag should be replaced with Control/@initFixField and
use the same nomenclature as Edit/@field, otherwise the OMS/EMS application
will have to supply this 'input data' in two forms (eg 38=100000 and
FIX_OrderQty=100000).
[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to
mailto:[email protected]]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
