[This message was posted by Russell Curry of Assimilate Technology, Inc. <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/819f38a0 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> A link to the proposal can be found at: > > http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/4977/FIXatdl-1.1.zip > > The public comment period ends on February 16, 2010. I guess this is just under the wire, but here goes: As someone who has developed a couple of full-blown WYSIWYG visual designers for FIXatdl and other specifications, I think the UI layout model in FIXatdl should really be revisited. The problem that I see with it is the same problem that you always have when you try to take a lowest common denominator approach to a problem - it turns out not to be enough, and then you end up introducing little hacks and tweaks which then result in you having your own proprietary UI layout which isn't really a good fit for any modern platform. It might make a lot more sense to just pick one commonly used UI layout model, either Java, Windows Forms, or something like Flex, and follow it to the letter rather than continuing to evolve a homebrew one. If you consider how nice modern UI layout systems work, like Windows Forms, Java, or Flex, and the fact that it is extremely easy to convert one of those layouts to the other, it just doesn't make sense to be trying to use the scientific method to develop a new one. I think FIXatdl would benefit tremendously from following any layout model other than what it uses today. I think if you just picked one type of layout, whether Windows Forms (anchor/dock), Java (unh...), or Flex (Box/HBox/VBox), people would have a much easier time implementing solutions using it. I know nothing about Java layout systems, but am reasonably confident that if FIXatdl followed one of them to the letter, including using only their UI controls, I could probably translate it to Windows Forms much faster and easier than I could implement the native FIXatdl layout. At any rate, just some thoughts on this, but I really think FIXatdl's current layout model isn't as good as it could be. It would make a lot more sense to just grab something that is already really well thought out, like the box layouts from Adobe Flex, and just bolt that in. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
