El 03/05/12 12:19, Miroslav Lichvar escribió:
> It makes the C function faster than the corresponding asm routine, so > if it's included I'd suggest to just drop the asm function to not keep > around more asm code than is necessary. With current compilers it is very likely that those routines are already superflous. _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev