El 03/05/12 12:19, Miroslav Lichvar escribió:

> It makes the C function faster than the corresponding asm routine, so
> if it's included I'd suggest to just drop the asm function to not keep
> around more asm code than is necessary.

With current compilers it is very likely that those routines are already 
superflous.
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to