El 07/05/12 09:11, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:22:00AM -0400, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: >> El 03/05/12 12:19, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: >> >> >>> It makes the C function faster than the corresponding asm routine, so >>> if it's included I'd suggest to just drop the asm function to not keep >>> around more asm code than is necessary. >> >> With current compilers it is very likely that those routines are already >> superflous. > > It seems the current compilers are not that good yet :). > > In a test on a Core 2 machine with gcc-4.6.3, i686 flac build with > nasm enabled is about 7% faster in decoding than without nasm. x86_64 > build is about 2% faster than the i686 build with nasm enabled.
Did you build with -fprofile-generate ... then make check .. then rebuild with -fprofile-use ? _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
