On 13-12-12 13:20, Max Horn wrote: > On 13.12.2012, at 03:57, Conrad Parker wrote: >> IIRC the xiph sites use server-side includes (apache SSI) for headers >> and footers. [...] >> > Yay, yet another version of the website :-). > > I am not really a fan of SSI myself, but if this is what is there, and people > are familiar with it, I think it should also do just fine.
I really had something like this in mind when I asked. After looking into it, it seems nice and simple to me, little can go wrong with this > As I said, another alternative would be to use a static website generator. Yes, but this has some drawbacks as well. I like to keep things simple until the very last step (apache rendering in this case) to keep it transparant. It might very well be that Josh used a static website generator, but as we don't have the source, we're stuck with these static files now. Finally, the don't like the idea of having two different but similar files. Source and binaries are very different, but static webpages and 'static website generator files' usually look a lot alike. I'd vote for SSI then. If no one else takes the job of converting it, I will, but not within the next two months. _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
