Hi Erik,

On 27.12.2012, at 12:28, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

> Max Horn wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> The important bits are others, and  they need comments and actions
>> by Erik and Rich.
> 
> Ralph maybe?

Yes, my mistake, sorry!

> 
> My current understanding is that we intend to keep the web site
> on flac.sf.net and have a mirror on xiph.org/flac.

Either is fine, just somebody has to do it, and apparently Ralph is the one 
with the access rights to do it. Ralph, if you need any assistance or further 
information for this, I am happy to help.


> 
> On flac.sf.net, we probably don't have SSI,

We do, actually, see

  http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Project%20web

and more specifically

  
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Project%20web%20and%20developer%20web%20platform

Moreover, there is also PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby and Tcl. 


> so that's a vote for
> a static site. I am however all in favor of whatever can be done
> to make updating and maintenance of the site easier.

Sure. This is a relatively simple website, and I'd prefer to follow the KISS 
principle there.

Supposing we do go with static website generator: Do you have a preference for 
a language that generator should be written in? In the sense that it should 
ideally be something you are ideally familiar. The primary choices are Python 
and Ruby, but Perl and (to a much lesser extent) shell script are also options.


Cheers,
Max
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to