thank you Josh and Brian, I have tried to change the padding and I succeded in getting a same size file ... but still different :-(
> ... different code paths through the encoder chosen at > runtime that are optimized for different environments which can > create different streams That said, I have to give up, there will be still cases in which I cannot get exactly the same FLAC file. Nothing dramatic. I was just curious about it. Thank you very much for yours explanations. Cheers. Stefano > --- inishmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I decode and then re-encode a FLAC file someone sent to me, and I get > > a different file (about 3K > > larger). > > > > I have used: > > - the same version of FLAC.EXE (hash-checked) used to create the > > original FLAC file > > - the same level of compression > > - no tag infos were included in the original FLAC file > > > > I can't really figure out how could it be possible, but sometimes it > > happens (of course many times I > > get exactly the same 'binary' file). > > > > Any idea? > > > > Thank you very much for attention. > > could be differences in padding, seektable, or other metadata, > or this: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/2005-July/000465.html > > or this > > http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave > > Josh > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
