Not sure if this is the "best" way but you can do:
var xml:XML = <my_xml>
<row id="a" />
<row id="b" />
<row id="c" />
</my_xml>;
xml.row.(@id == "a").children = xml.row.(@id != "a");
xml.setChildren(xml.row.(@id == "a"));
trace(xml);
// trace
<my_xml>
<row id="a">
<row id="b"/>
<row id="c"/>
</row>
</my_xml>
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
On 11/10/2011 14:53, Paul Andrews wrote:
What's the best way to turn
this:
myXMLNode =
<my_xml>
< row id="a" />
< row id="b" />
< row id="c" />
</my_xml>;
into:
<my_xml>
< row id="a">
< row id="b" />
< row id="c" />
</row>
</my_xml>
Using some E4X?
It's not so much a case of adding b and c as children of a, but of
removing them so I don't end up with:
<my_xml>
< row id="a">
< row id="b" />
< row id="c" />
</row>
< row id="b" />
< row id="c" />
</my_xml>
Paul
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
