Thanks again Tom. The example is impressive.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:21 AM, tom rhodes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ok, initially the haxe flash api to html5 was done with a lib called jeash.
> which has been around for a while now. the nme project has very recently
> incorporated jeash as it's route to html5.
>
> here is a nice example of using one codebase to hit swf and html5...
>
>
> http://www.joshuagranick.com/blog/2011/09/22/first-glimpse-at-cross-platform-game-running-flash-and-html5/
>
> if you do a google for haxe jeash, you'll see it's been around for a while
> and it's integration into nme seems pretty natural. they were parallel
> efforts in intepreting the flash api for ages...
>
> On 30 November 2011 14:03, Kurt Dommermuth <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Thank you.  I'm going to look into Haxe more.
> >
> > Psychologically I have a stumbling block with NME.  On their how it works
> > page (http://www.haxenme.org/about-nme/how-it-works/) there are
> solutions
> > that go in the opposite direction of what I'm personally interested in.
> >
> > They very nicely show how NME publishes to SWF, iOS, webOS, Android,
> > MAC/LInux, but it doesn't mention publishing to HTML5/JS.
> >
> > It very well may, but you can understand why I'd tend to move on if it's
> > not mentioned on that page.
> >
> > Forgive me if I'm missing something.  I'm deep in this search for a
> > solution and I'll be the first to admit I could easily misunderstand
> > something.
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:33 AM, tom rhodes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > the haxe forum isn't very active but the mailing list is, and it is a
> > great
> > > place to get help to get started.
> > >
> > > this is the new home of the list
> > >
> > > https://groups.google.com/group/haxelang/topics?pli=1
> > >
> > > you have to dig around a bit to get going as documentation is limited
> at
> > > the moment but the list is the best place to get the information you
> > need.
> > >
> > > if you want to do html5 using code that is familiar to you as an AS3
> > coder
> > > then look at NME as i mentioned in a previous post.
> > >
> > > On 30 November 2011 13:16, Kurt Dommermuth <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jason,
> > > >
> > > > You're very first statement is exactly what interests me too.  You
> > wrote
> > > > "Thinking of starting to learn haXe to produce OOP apps and export as
> > > > Javascript for HTML 5 apps."
> > > >
> > > > What are your thoughts so far?  I just looked at Haxe too but I'm
> > > concerned
> > > > because there doesn't seem to be a lot of actvity in the Haxe forum.
> > > >
> > > > I'm at a loss this morning because at this moment I really just want
> to
> > > > make a web based app that performs well on the iPhone. I have looked
> at
> > > the
> > > > following and am not finding satisfaction:
> > > >
> > > > appmobi - they get too many hooks into you and force you down paths
> you
> > > may
> > > > not necessarily want to go - like using the Amazon network to store
> > > files.
> > > > I just wanted to grab my resources and upload them to MY server.  No
> > easy
> > > > task with appmobi.
> > > >
> > > > phonegap - everyone seems to love it, but it seems to be primarily
> > geared
> > > > to use traditional web based tools to compile to native apps.  I want
> > to
> > > be
> > > > on the web - not the device.
> > > >
> > > > jQuery mobile - assumes you want to make a web site, not an app and
> > > injects
> > > > all kinds of styles that get in the way.  I'm a big fan of jQuery,
> but
> > > > jQuery mobile is very confining.
> > > >
> > > > sencha - seems promising, but within 2 hours of working with it I
> seem
> > to
> > > > have found a bug.  I cannot add a listener.  May be my
> misunderstanding
> > > > though, so I'm going to continue.
> > > >
> > > > Based on this conversation I looked at NME, but again, my small
> > > mindedness,
> > > > it feels like voodoo and it just doesn't seem to put much emphasis on
> > > > publishing for web based apps.
> > > >
> > > > Overall, I must say I resent the hell out of Steve Jobs.  His
> comments
> > > have
> > > > thrown us back into the dark ages. I look at the options to
> accommodate
> > > his
> > > > vision and I see one Frankenstein solution after another.  HTML5
> seems
> > to
> > > > be a handful of multimedia tags meant to make everyone and their mom
> a
> > > web
> > > > programer and that it will work on everything.  Hahhahahaha.  The
> > problem
> > > > is that the reality is it takes a boat load of JS and fall backs to
> > make
> > > it
> > > > work.
> > > >
> > > > We had AS3.  It did the job and though it was flawed it was far and
> > away
> > > > the best cross platform solution there was. dammit.  Because of one
> > dummy
> > > > and his legions of lemmings we're back to using 15 year old scripting
> > > > languages to get things done.
> > > >
> > > > Hmmmm.  Guess I'm a little feisty and bitter this morning!
> > > >
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for letting me vent.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I appreciate the discussion very much on this topic.
> > > >
> > > > Kurt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Merrill, Jason <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thinking of starting to learn haXe to produce OOP apps and export
> as
> > > > > Javascript for HTML 5 apps. Checked it out years ago, but decided
> > > against
> > > > > it since it was not part of the normal ecosystem and would have to
> be
> > > > > sharing code with non-haXe AS3 developers. But not thinking of the
> > > > future,
> > > > > I am more interested in it given what's happening with Adobe and
> > HTML5.
> > > > > Anyone done that and does it work well for that?  Can you have a
> > single
> > > > > source base and export for AS3 apps and Javascript for HTML 5 or
> are
> > > > there
> > > > > caveats?
> > > > >
> > > > >  Jason Merrill
> > > > >  Instructional Technology Architect II
> > > > >  Bank of America  Global Learning
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is
> privileged,
> > > > > confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient,
> > > please
> > > > > notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies
> and
> > > > > attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or
> > the
> > > > > taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in
> or
> > > > > attached to this message is prohibited.
> > > > > Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell
> > or
> > > a
> > > > > solicitation of any investment products or other financial product
> or
> > > > > service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an
> official
> > > > > statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may
> intercept,
> > > > > monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through
> > its
> > > > > networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law
> > > > > enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
> > > > > The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the
> > > handling
> > > > > of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries
> > > other
> > > > > than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be
> > > > > guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
> > > > >
> > > > > References to "Sender" are references to any subsidiary of Bank of
> > > > America
> > > > > Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC
> > Insured
> > > *
> > > > > Are Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit *
> > Are
> > > > Not
> > > > > a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by
> > Any
> > > > > Federal Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may
> > > have
> > > > > additional important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should
> > > read.
> > > > > This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
> > > > > http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
> > Sender
> > > > > you consent to the foregoing.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to