Hey Anthony,
Found this article. Maybe it will spark a light for you.
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/as3/dev/WS5b3ccc516d4fbf351e63e3d118a9b90204-7d1d.html
Sry, not much more help.
HTH,
Best,
Karl
On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Anthony Pace wrote:
Wow. Just read through my post, and saw the errors. Guess I
shouldn't get 3 hours sleep and then try to type.
Second try:
No replies? Okay then. As the player doesn't seem to make the
buffered data available unless it has a full 2^n chunk within a
given timeframe, and also considering that there doesn't seem to be
a way to just grab the currently buffered bytes, then I guess doing
what I want just isn't possible, at least in this version of the
player (hope for the future).
This is really sad; for, imho, the developer should be able to at
least state the minimum sample size he wants reported per
SampleDataEvent, and not just the rate per second.
In combination with setting the desired sampling rate (e.g mic.rate
= 44), being able to set the minimum buffer amount to be reported,
and to set no delays would be perfect .
e.g.
mic.sampleBufferMin = 8; // 2^8 = 256 must be value between 8 and
etc...
mic.sampleBufferMin = 9;// 2^9 = 512 is what would work in my case
mic.reportImmediately = true; //to avoid having to wait until the
next frame is collected if it couldn't collect enough to report in
time
or even being able to access the bytes already in the buffer without
having to wait until SampleDataEvent is allowed to fire
e.g.
myByteArray = mic.pollBuffer(); //or bytesLoaded or w/e you would
prefer to call it
Up until now, I really didn't care about things like latency, as I
was merely attempting to learn algorithms for post processing
related tasks; yet, now that I have become interested in realtime
tasks, and would love to be able to perform them in the browser,
it's becoming an issue.
On 12/20/2011 4:32 PM, Anthony Pace wrote:
Just in case you are wondering why...
although I know I could just split up the sample amount into
smaller 512 sample chunks, I am interested in doing some lower
latency effects, and the delay is just too much to bare right now.
On 12/20/2011 3:37 PM, Anthony Pace wrote:
Is this possible?
When recording from the Mic, in this case at 44100hz I can't get
the SampleDataEvent to report sample chunks of less than 2048
samples. The problem really is that it flash waits about 47 ms
on average to report a sample chunk (although my counter shows it
updates between 33ms and 60ms), and in some cases even though
there is no load, it waits until it can report 4098 samples (even
though there is no load); yet, I only need/want 512 samples in
approximately 12ms on average.
If, while keeping the same sample rate, there is some official
way to decrease the chunk size being reported and the time it
takes to report it, I can't see it; therefore, I am hoping there
may be some way of just getting to the Sample Data before it's
reported?
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
