Hello, Alpha at MAX on Oct 17.
Final shipment in the first half of next calander year. -David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Merrill, Jason > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:47 PM > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flash player 8.5 and ActionScript 3.0 > > Yeah, I know, I was just guessing since if you have an alpha > in the spring, I couldn't figure how the final version > wouldn't be out until 2007, but what do I know. This is > really exciting stuff. > > Jason Merrill > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike > >>Chambers > >>Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:19 PM > >>To: Flashcoders mailing list > >>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash player 8.5 and ActionScript 3.0 > >> > >> > >>Yes. Except, i didn't say that Flash 9 (or whatever it is called), > >>will be out in a year. > >> > >>Historically the release cycles for Flash have been 18 - 24 months. > >> > >>mike chambers > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>Merrill, Jason wrote: > >>> Thanks Darron and Cortlandt - that makes more sense now. > >>So if I have > >>> this right, in the spring, we get an alpha version of a > >>partial "Flash > >>> 9" which has AS3 to play with, but this is nothing to buy, > >>just to test > >>> in the 8.5 player. The next update to Flash will NOT be a > >>dot release, > >>> it will be Flash 9 with AS3 which will be available to > >>purchase maybe a > >>> year or so from now. So this is a somewhat shorter > >>development cycle > >>> than usual. > >>> > >>> Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | icfconsulting.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:flashcoders- > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cortlandt Winters > >>>>>Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:52 PM > >>>>>To: Flashcoders mailing list > >>>>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash player 8.5 and ActionScript 3.0 > >>>>> > >>>>>Hi Jason > >>>>> > >>>>>I think the next full version of flash authoring will be > >>flash9, and > >>> > >>> that an > >>> > >>>>>early alpha might be availble in the spring, but there > >>will be no QA'd > >>>>>update to 8 to support As3. You can probably put this in > >>the context > >>> > >>> of "MM > >>> > >>>>>will be Adobe soon", so that even if they wanted to just > support an > >>> > >>> as3 > >>> > >>>>>update to flash8, it would probably be a logistical nightmare. So > >>> > >>> whatever > >>> > >>>>>is available in the spring it will be a part of the next > release of > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>>>>authoring environment, not a free update to the current release. > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm not an MM employee, but that's how I read it. > >>>>> > >>>>>-Cort > >>>>> > >>>>>On 10/6/05, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>Mike Chambers, can you clarify? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Judah wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Could you clarify what "Flash Authoring" is and what > "the next > >>> > >>> full > >>> > >>>>>>>>>version of authoring" is? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>So Mike Chambers replied: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Flash Professional 8 > >>>>>>>>Just to clarify. There is no update for Flash Professional 8 > >>> > >>> planned. > >>> > >>>>>>But Mike Chambers also wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>There will be an early alpha of the next full version of > >>> > >>> authoring > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>that includes ActionScript 3 support. This will be > >>available in > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>spring. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>So now I'm really confused! Those sound like contradictory > >>> > >>> statements. > >>> > >>>>>>If Flash Authoring = Flash 8 (Flash IDE) and the next > full version > >>> > >>> of > >>> > >>>>>>authoring will be available in the spring, then how can > no update > >>> > >>> for > >>> > >>>>>>Flash be planned? Is this "authoring" you're referring > to NOT the > >>> > >>> Flash > >>> > >>>>>>IDE? Can you clarify what this "thing" is that will be > released in > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>>>>>"spring" or at least explain the contradiction? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | > >>>>> > >>>>>icfconsulting.com<http://icfconsulting.com> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>NOTICE: > >>>>>>This message is for the designated recipient only and > may contain > >>>>>>privileged or confidential information. If you have > received it in > >>> > >>> error, > >>> > >>>>>>please notify the sender immediately and delete the > original. Any > >>> > >>> other use > >>> > >>>>>>of this e-mail by you is prohibited. > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>Flashcoders mailing list > >>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>Flashcoders mailing list > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Flashcoders mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > >>> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Flashcoders mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > >> > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
