On 10/25/05, Robert Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a much simpler example than the one I posted earlier. The code
> doesn't do anything, but it's simple enough to quickly understand that
> (a) the code is syntactically correct and (b) how a compile-time cyclic
> dependency is involved.
>
> //-- A.as
> class A {
> var dependent : B;
> }
>
> //-- B.as
> class B {
> var dependent : A;
> }
>
> This fails to compile, giving the same meaningless message noted
> previously. Can someone from Macromedia let me know if this bug has been
> logged?
If you want macromedia to respond, might want to contact them directly.
-David R
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
