Consumers push the shoe car and computer market to offer diversity.   I
don't remember a software consumer complaining that their gui control was
too familiar or easy to use ;-) 

As an aside, I love the book 'About Face:  Interaction Design' which has a
chapter on designing interactions, and the differences between a visual
artist (someone who wants to provoke a reaction to their piece of art) and a
visual designer (someone who has to represent software behaviour based on
the goals of other people).


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cedric
Muller
Sent: 15 November 2005 08:44
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components

same with shoes, cars and computers ..
yep, we are in That World :-)

> I disagree...users don't give a damn whether a component is skinned or 
> not, but whether it works as a piece of UI.  How many different 
> comboboxes do we need in the world??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> JesterXL
> Sent: 14 November 2005 21:06
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components
>
> I find just the opposite; I think it's easier in Flex.
>
> I'm with you, though.  The pendulum has swung too far to the other 
> side.
> Pre-Flash MX, it was "no Flash UI assets look the same".  Now, post 
> Flex 1.5 it's "all Flex apps look the same".
>
> Mars needs women.  Flex needs UI designers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components
>
>
> yeah, they do look better than the IDE ones, but its easier to skin 
> stuff in flash than flex from my experience thus far. due to this we 
> are seeing more and more apps looking very similiar, which as a 
> non-designer i think sucks.
>
> On 11/14/05, JesterXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The Flex ones look better. Before people realized they were coded 
>> better, a few wanted the look and feel since it was refined.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dustin Krysak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 3:48 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components
>>
>>
>> Maybe in case there are aspects of a project developed in both flash 
>> and flex?
>>
>> Not sure otherwise.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14-Nov-05, at 12:45 PM, Johannes Nel wrote:
>>
>>> why????????????????????????
>>>
>>> On 11/14/05, Hindman, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nope ...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dwuser.com/flexcomponents/
>>>>
>>>> -- Jeff Hindman
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pete Hotchkiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:43 AM
>>>> To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
>>>> Subject: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a very vague recollection of somebody somewhere creating a 
>>>> set of Flex Styled components for Flash MX2004 - was I dreaming ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Flashcoders mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Flashcoders mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> j:pn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Flashcoders mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flashcoders mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flashcoders mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>
>
>
>
> --
> j:pn
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
>

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to