Mike, do you have an example of this? My current test shows the opposite - that convolution is proving more cpu intensive than blurfilter?
> Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my tests convolution filter was much faster than a blurfilter. > But it's an easy one to swap oout and test for yourself... > Andreas Rønning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know which is faster; a blurring one-pass convolution filter > or a blurfilter? Or are they just 2 sides to the same story? I need a > high performance blur operation for depth of field.. > > Cheers, > > - Andreas _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
