Are these just the filters applied to a stright MC? It'd be interesting to see the same thing done double buffered - with the filters being applied to the bitmapdata before it is drawn back.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mike Duguid > Sent: 31 January 2006 13:05 > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance > > I've stuck another example here: http://www.flashcool.com/blur.html > On the pc, as Mike said, convolution is faster, but if you > need more than a subtle blur may not be what's required. > > On 1/30/06, Andreas Rønning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know which is faster; a blurring one-pass convolution > > filter or a blurfilter? Or are they just 2 sides to the > same story? I > > need a high performance blur operation for depth of field.. > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
