first off lets clear up the use of words here:
argument:
1. A discussion in which disagreement is expressed; a debate.
2. A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood
example: presented
a careful argument for extraterrestrial life.
3. A summary or short statement of the plot or subject of a literary work.

i meant argument in the like number 2

from dictionary .com. and  me not being a native english speaker having to
point this out. tut tut tut.

my argument (meaning 2) is that zorn is relatively stable. api's might have
changed again between beta 1 and beta 2 and stuff will change to beta 3.
this should not influence a project to much.
futhermore, large companies are spending large amounts doing r&d on this, so
if they are trying to build stuff with it why shouldn't you try to port an
existing app that works.

building a brand spanking new app that you have a tight deadline on for
midsummer is crazy talk, but taking something which works (hence you have
something you can fall back ojn if you go over schedule) and building that
using flex2 can only benefit a company and an individual from a strategic
position.

enough of this argument (1,2 and or 3) now.




On 3/15/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>i don't quite agree with your argument.
>
> I am not making any "argument" - not sure where you're getting that - I
> just said I wouldn't risk it myself, personally.  Macromedia just posted
> in this thread that "It is always risky to build on a beta... you need
> to judge your tolerence for risk."  It's just a business decision, and
> not one I am willing to risk with my own clients.
>
> Jason Merrill   |   E-Learning Solutions   |  icfconsulting.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johannes Nel
> >>Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 6:24 PM
> >>To: Flashcoders mailing list
> >>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex2 Project Conversion
> >>
> >>i am contracting to large company and we are doing stuff using flex2,
> so...
> >>i don't quite agree with your argument. also note what he says, they
> want to
> >>move an existing app to flex2 and his concern is that it will change
> >>radically from beta 1 to final product. the very fact that beta 2 is
> coming
> >>out means that things are relatively stable and well along the path. i
> think
> >>starting now will be a good idea. but thats just my opinion.
> >>
> >>On 3/14/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I wouldn't bet any project on a beta personally - unless I had
> insiders
> >>> at Adobe, but even then...
> >>>
> >>> Jason Merrill   |   E-Learning Solutions   |  icfconsulting.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:flashcoders-
> >>> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Aebig
> >>> >>Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:35 PM
> >>> >>To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
> >>> >>Subject: [Flashcoders] Flex2 Project Conversion
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Hey all,
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>The company I work for is interested in moving one of our large
> >>> applications
> >>> >>over to Flex when the new version comes out. Is it worthwhile or
> even
> >>> >>feasible to begin porting it over with the Beta release or are we
> >>> wasting
> >>> >>our time considering that quite a bit of it could change
> beforehand.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>I'd hate to put in a lot of time into this only to find out that
> my
> >>> source
> >>> >>files are rendered obsolete when the new version is finally
> released.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Thanks for your input,
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>!k
> >>> >>
> >>> >>_______________________________________________
> >>> >>[email protected]
> >>> >>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> >>> >>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> >>> >>Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> >>> >>http://www.figleaf.com
> >>> >>http://training.figleaf.com
> >>> NOTICE:
> >>> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> >>> privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in
> error,
> >>> please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any
> other use
> >>> of this e-mail by you is prohibited.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> >>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >>>
> >>> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> >>> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> >>> http://www.figleaf.com
> >>> http://training.figleaf.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>j:pn
> >>http://www.lennel.org
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>[email protected]
> >>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> >>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >>
> >>Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> >>Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> >>http://www.figleaf.com
> >>http://training.figleaf.com
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>



--
j:pn
http://www.lennel.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to