>>Would be interesting to compare with recently released Screenweaver HX >>(http://haxe.org/swhx). > > > ...says one of the authors of Screenweaver HX. Being a shill doesn't > work unless you use a different name. ;)
Steven. You're posting your self-made comparison proclaiming mProjector as the uber-wrapper. I don't see any moral problem at pointing you at a new - completely rewritten from scratch - version of ScreenWeaver so that you can compare it as well. Now I could come with my own comparison or "selling points", but I guess that would not be seen as something fair, so it's better to give links to people so they can start making their own opinion. Depending on the features needed by the end-user, there might not be one single "kill-them-all" choice. If you want to be impartial and be able to efficiently advise people about projector wrappers, you should stop throwing random facts without evaluating first other technologies. I'm in general quite reluctant to listen to people calling "crap!" before they even had a look at a given solution. Finally, I've been working with Edwin on SWHX and while I can't say about previous Screenweaver, I can ensure you about the code quality of SWHX. And you know what ? You can check it by yourself by browsing https://svn.motion-twin.com/haxeDesktop/swhx. If you find any bug, please report it to us ;) Nicolas _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
