Have you tried flv. don't know why but flvs always work much smoother for me.
On 10/10/06, Zeh Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to work but it kills my CPU making everyother thing in the site > not > working and making the video running slowlier. When I go back to fordward > playing everything goes back to normality. > Any clues? Do I have to look for some flaws in my code or is there > something > wrong with embbebed video? It's probably neither one of those alternatives - it's more like a fact of life. The way temporal compression works for video is by having one keyframe (the entire image) followed by several frames (chunks of image that only specify changes to the image data). When doing forward this is fine, but when seeking to a different frame, the render has to actually go to an specific keyframe, then render forward to the specified frame. Because of this, going backwards really *is* much more difficult to any player or codec (unless you have one keyframe every frame, which defeats the purpose of temporal compression). If you're having that problem, try lowering the steps between keyframes on your video (say, one keyframe every 15 frames instead of one every 30 frames). It should make things better, but at a cost - your video file will be bigger. Zeh _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
