Sorry Muzak last time I checked your links didnt work, but forgot to report it. Ill check m now.
On 10/24/06, Muzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, this is a really old discussion: http://www.peterjoel.com/blog/?archive=2004_08_01_archive.xml http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/pipermail/flashcoders/2005-June/140994.html http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/?q=delegate http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/?q=remove%20delegate etc.. regards, Muzak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans Wichman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] Delegates and performance Hi, i agree, but it is only true, as long as there is a reference to the inline function. The text seems to suggest that although the reference to the inline function is gone, it still stays on memory. greetz JC _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
