Hi, yeah my example was downscaling, while you are upscaling:). var intMapScale:Number = mcMap._width / 744; // width = 2710 // 364% (3,64) so btnScale is 100/intMapScale.
Imagine mcMap._width had been 1000 and original was 500, you'd have 1000/500 = 200% so btnScale 100/200% is 50. Note about the percentages, they make for easy errors. Multiplying/dividing by one hundred too many, tends to give awesome, though wrong, results:). greetz JC On 11/1/06, Jon Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So in general to keep a child scaled at 100% independents of its parents, > > you need to divide 100% by the result of multiplying all its parent's scale > > factors. > > > > Eg, to keep e at 100%, you'd scale e to : 1/ ( > > a.scale*b.scale*c.scale*d.scale/100^4) > > so My original MC is 744 px wide, and I scale it so it's width is > 2710, which is a scale of 364%, which means I need to scale my links > to, umm....... I've tried: var intMapScale:Number = mcMap._width / 744; // width = 2710 var btnScale:Number = intMapScale / 100; that can;t be right though, as it gives me a tiny number, any pointers as to where I've gone wrong? Thanks, jon -- jon bennett t: +44 (0) 1225 341 039 w: http://www.jben.net/ iChat (AIM): jbendotnet Skype: jon-bennett _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
