I should add - I've used other systems in the past (notably Scarab for issue tracking and both VSS and CVS for issue tracking) and the current trac/SVN system beats them all hands down for ease-of-use and stability.
HTH, Ian On 11/28/06, Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Marcelo, We use trac/wvn for all our projects and it works very well for us; and it does support simple user/password authentication. The only downside is that trac is designed to host only one project - multiple projects mean multiple databases (if you want to seperate tickets etc.) and there's no reporting across the multiple databases. To get around this we've written a very simple front-end which collates all the 'outstanding tickets' RSS info into one web page, so each developer can see what's on his ToDo list. :-) It's working very well. Cheers, Ian On 11/28/06, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey guys, > > We've got our own web development company (pretty small at moment, but > that's not the question really :)) and we are looking forward to a good > SCM/Project Management tool for all of our project managent needs. We would > like to know what other fellow osflasher's use and maybe share some insights > about these tools. We are considering to install trac on our server, trac > seems to be a very good option (specially its integration with SVN), however > I've only seen it used on open source projects so far and we will be using > it only for our commercial projects (does it offer some kind of > user-authentication system?). > > Thanks! > > Marcelo.
_______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
