Joel,
Another good optimization point, Joel. If we assume that Karim's custom
cursor is already a child of the stage, then setChildIndex() should be more
efficient. So I guess it depends on the implementation.
Interestingly,
I get a RangeError with this:
stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren);
but this works:
stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1);
However,
stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren);
does not trigger the RangeError, and
stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1);
still produces the desired result.
If this is a bug then 'stage.numChildren - 1' would be the safe way to go.
Regards,
-Keith
http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Stransky
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:25 AM
> To: Flash Coders List
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
>
> Very nice Keith. Wouldn't setChildIndex() work as well? Or is addChildAt()
> better for ensuring that the cursor is added to the display list?
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Keith Reinfeld
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
