It could be seen as a bug. addChildAt tells flash to ADD to the current
number of children. setChildIndex works within the existing children.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Keith Reinfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Cor,
>
> addChildAt() -- Tested:
>
> Any index 0 thru numChildren (inclusive) = No RangeError.
>
> Any index greater than numChildren = RangeError.
>
> That's why I thought 'bug'.
>
> Just an observation. Just trying to help.
>
> So, Cor, howyabin?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Keith
> http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cor
> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 1:18 PM
> > To: 'Flash Coders List'
> > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
> >
> > I guess because you set the customCursor in the array position.
> > And array positions can be set to any index, and for that matter it can't
> > be
> > out of range.
> >
> > stage.addChildAt(customCursor, 100); will try to put the child at index
> > hundred.
> > Eventually the displayList notices a empty index and will shuffle
> > everything
> > in place so there is never an empty indexed location.
> > The same as when you remove a child for the displayList.
> >
> > I am not completely sure if this is the correct technical description,
> but
> > from what I have read about the displayList, it figures.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Cor
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
> > Reinfeld
> > Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 20:11
> > To: 'Flash Coders List'
> > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
> >
> > Hi Cor,
> >
> > Right. I know all that. The question is why doesn't
> >
> >       stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren);
> >
> > trigger a RangeError?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Keith
> > http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cor
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:38 PM
> > > To: 'Flash Coders List'
> > > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
> > >
> > > It is not a bug.
> > > The displayList stores it objects in a Array, wich starts at 0.
> > > So Array["obj1","obj2","obj3","obj4"] has 4 children wich are located
> at
> > > position 0, 1, 2, 3.
> > > If you remove a child every other moves up 1 place.
> > >
> > > So stage.numChildren is accordingly out of range.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > > C
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
> > > Reinfeld
> > > Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 18:57
> > > To: 'Flash Coders List'
> > > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
> > >
> > > Joel,
> > >
> > > Another good optimization point, Joel. If we assume that Karim's custom
> > > cursor is already a child of the stage, then setChildIndex() should be
> > > more
> > > efficient. So I guess it depends on the implementation.
> > >
> > > Interestingly,
> > >
> > > I get a RangeError with this:
> > >
> > >     stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren);
> > >
> > > but this works:
> > >
> > >     stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1);
> > >
> > > However,
> > >
> > >     stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren);
> > >
> > > does not trigger the RangeError, and
> > >
> > >     stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1);
> > >
> > > still produces the desired result.
> > >
> > > If this is a bug then 'stage.numChildren - 1' would be the safe way to
> > go.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > -Keith
> > > http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Stransky
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:25 AM
> > > > To: Flash Coders List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3
> > > >
> > > > Very nice Keith. Wouldn't setChildIndex() work as well? Or is
> > > addChildAt()
> > > > better for ensuring that the cursor is added to the display list?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Keith Reinfeld
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.3/1788 - Release Date: 14-11-
> > 2008
> > > 13:36
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.3/1788 - Release Date:
> 14-11-2008
> > 13:36
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>



-- 
--Joel Stransky
stranskydesign.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to