Dave Watts wrote:
Allow me to summarize your post:
That never works out very well, does it? Because it seems to me that
your summary missed a lot of Paul's points.
When summarizing, you have to remove details. I just focused on what I
felt was the core message.
But if you just see Flex as nothing more than a subset of Flash, you're kind of
missing the point.
Oh, but I am not. Flex is not just a subset of Flash. It has it's own
components that Flash does not come with. It also has mxml, that Flash
does not support at all. And for builder, it has a bunch of profilers,
and Flash has none.
I just think that the Flash unique features are better than the Flex
unique features for most purposes.
And of course, you can use both. With the announced Flash and Flex
Builder integration, that will work even better.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
