You are holding onto the string reference created after addding the ".html" and not the reference to the object that doesn't have the ".html", right?
--- On Thu, 3/11/10, Susan Day <[email protected]> wrote: From: Susan Day <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Passing Call To Child To: "Flash Coders List" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 12:57 PM On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Paul Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > Well it shows that it has nothing to do with the ".html" being missing and > nowhere have you shown where you assigned the string with ".html" added. > I believe I made it clear before that I assign the ".html" to the url. I believe most urls end in html, py, php, asp, etc., and that most variables with a url would be written like a url. I have mentioned previously that this var prints out correctly in the fn in which it is defined and incorrectly--specifying without the html--in the onClick fn. Yes, I believe I've made this clear before. And I'm making it clear again. Why is it that the assigning fn traces this var with the extension and that the onClick fn doesn't?? > > We are going around in circles. > I don't think that's my fault, sorry. Susan _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
