THANK YOU!!!!
2010/4/16 tom rhodes <[email protected]>: > File > Publish Settings > Flash > Actionscript 3.0 Settings > Strict Mode > (uncheck it) > > that's your easiest solution if you are having trouble. once you get more > into the AS3 side of things you won't need it any more... > > > On 16 April 2010 17:33, natalia Vikhtinskaya <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes I expected that Flash and AS3 could be used for simple task >> without creating classes. But as I see now it is not true. >> If you I have clip with some animation and I want communicate with >> main timeline at the end of animation I cannot do that. And I cannot >> find any solution for that. >> >> I have the same error if clip with animation is on stage or it is >> added with code on main timeline. >> trace(parent.countN) from the clip and result is >> >> 1119: Access of possibly undefined property countN through a reference >> with static type flash.display:DisplayObjectContainer. >> >> What can be more simple than this task? And that does not work. >> >> >> 2010/4/16 jonathan howe <[email protected]>: >> > So, my untested proposal is this: >> > >> > Root timeline, don't instantiate your subclip with code. Just put it on >> the >> > stage with an instance name, and refer to it then. >> > In the subclip, you can then refer to parent.counter or whatever your >> > variable is, because you're guaranteed that you have a parent if you >> never >> > instantiate the subclip with code. >> > >> > I think the problem was, you instantiated clip_mc before adding it to the >> > stage (of course), but then it's constructor you are asking for something >> in >> > its parent - but it doesn't have a parent yet. >> > >> > Eventually learn classes and work it out that way, but we >> > shouldn't stonewall you from using timeline code for a simple animator's >> > task (this is one reason why Flash is so pervasive guys, because it was >> easy >> > for you to jump into with basic interactivity, right?). >> > >> > -jonathan >> > >> > >> > , >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Henrik Andersson <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> >> >> >>> I think its not simple because you are scripting timeline wise. Got to >> >>> pick. AS2 or AS3. >> >>> I believe what they were trying to say was if you have all the code in >> >>> classes, >> >>> you can communicate between the root and the added movie clip because >> >>> the classes >> >>> reference each other, not the timeline. Plus you will be referencing >> >>> objects, >> >>> so communicating between the objects through the classes is how it's >> >>> done in AS3. >> >>> >> >>> Am I on the right track guys? >> >>> >> >> >> >> You are not. You have gotten tangled up in the elitism spread by people >> who >> >> doesn't actually work with Flash. >> >> >> >> There is no reason not to use the properties that you have to get the >> >> references. You just need to remember to cast them to the proper type. >> >> >> >> The trick is to know when to apply the fancy rules and when not to. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Flashcoders mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -jonathan howe >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Flashcoders mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
