Hi Jason! Thanks so much for the constructive feedback, I really appreciate it. :)
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Merrill, Jason <jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com> wrote: > This is one of those occasional questions where I would ask, even if you > could do this, why would it really be necessary from an architectural point > of view? I see what you are trying to accomplish technically from in your > original post, but the broader architectural question comes into play and > something may be off if you're trying to go this route. That's just my > thought. Great points/observations. In this case, I am working with a box ad sent by a client... Sometimes they forget to add a "clickTAG" to their code. I have a different approach for AS < 2 FLAs, but sometimes the clients send FLAs that need/utilize AS3... Long story short, occasionally, I have to crack open their FLA and add AS3 clickTAG support. I would say that 99% of the time the client will not be using a document class, so I can easily assign my class to the document and publish. The other one percent of the time, they might have a document class already assigned, so I would just create a MC in the lib and assign my class to that. But, you are right; I should write two classes (one for the different situations). TBTH, I thought I was being "cool" by trying to handle two "situations" in one class. :D Anyway, thanks again for the feedback! I will take your advice and change my code. Note: If only these Flash ad designers could remember to add their own clickTAG code, then I would not be making myself look silly in front of all you pro Flash gurus! :D Have a great day! Cheers, Micky _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
