you should consider to use a linked list -- Pedro Taranto
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Kerry Thompson <al...@cyberiantiger.biz>wrote: > Deepak Sahu wrote: > > > consider a vector..its faster than array. > > It is. There are a couple of essential differences you should know of. > Primarily, all the elements of the vector need to be of the same type. > I think it will work with objects. > > The other difference is that you can't have empty elements in a > vector. This is perfectly legal for an array: > > arr[0] = 0; > arr[1] = 1; > arr[100] = 100; > > You have 99 empty elements in that array--that is, there is nothing in > arr[2]...arr[99]. > > You can't do that with a vector. I think the compiler will throw an > error. If not, you'll get an error at runtime. > > Cordially, > > Kerry Thompson > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
