On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 25.10.2009 03:48, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 02:50:03AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:42:21AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >>
> >>> - return ich_gpio_raise(name, 0x8086, 0x2640, 0x48, 0x0c, 0xffc0, 19);
> >>> + struct pci_dev *dev;
> >>> +
> >>> + dev = pci_dev_find(0x8086, 0x2640); /* Intel ICH6 LPC Interface */
> >>> + if (!dev) {
> >>> + fprintf(stderr, "\nERROR: Intel ICH9R LPC not found.\n");
> >>>
> >> One comment says ICH6, the other ICH9R. One of them is wrong.
> >>
> >
> > Oh please.
> >
>
> Actually, this is the reason why I didn't want chipset names in board
> enable functions. It's so easy to get them wrong when using cut-n-paste.
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel
It's the fact that only the last one is worth actually caring for that
is bothering me here. I really can not believe that capitalisation is
something anyone can care for like this.
I prefer to do real work.
Luc Verhaegen.
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
